A Note on Naming Conventions
The Elixir, QSO, and DADS teams refer to several conceptually distinct
periods of time as a 'run'. There is the `Camera run', the period of
time when the instrument (CFH12K) is mounted on the telescope. This
is the usual quantum of interest for Elixir processing. There is the
`QSO (or queue) run', a contiguous period of time during which the QSO
system is being used as the main mode of operation of the telescope.
A single QSO run will always be contained within a single Camera run,
but it is possible for a single Camera run to be divided into multiple
QSO runs, or not to include any QSO runs at all. A `PI run'
identifies a collection of images which have been obtained, either
classically or in QSO mode for a specific PI. A `PI run' is not
necessarily a contiguous period of time, but PI runs are only valid
within a specific semester. We use 6 character codes to identify any
of these runs. Camera runs are given names of the form 01Ak01, where
the first two digits refer to the year, and the following letter to
the semester in that year, the 'k' identifies this as the 'CFH12K'
camera (as opposed to m for Megacam, w for Wircam, etc), and the last
two digits identify the run within the semester. Similarly, QSO runs
are given names of the form 01BQ01. PI runs have the form 01AH24,
where the H identifies UH, C for Canada, F for France, D for
discretionary time, E for engineering time, Q for QSO specific
projects (ie, 01AQ97 = standard stars, 01AQ99 = detrend images).
There will be some minor ambiguity between camera runs and Korean
agency PI runs, but this should not introduce confusion.
Elixir End-of-Run Processing
At the end of each camera run, the Elixir system is used for a variety
of tasks needed for complete calibration of the science images. The
tasks include: the creation of the master detrend images, the
astrometric calibration for each science and standard star image, the
photometric analysis of the standard stars, and an assessment of the
results from the photometric standards. The analysis steps are
performed in sequence, as the later steps depend on the results of the
earlier steps.
The detrend creation system involves the creation of master dark,
bias, and flat images. Master fringe frames are created in a second
step. Both steps are described in more detail elsewhere (REFERENCE),
so we provide a summary here. All of the relevant images obtained
during the run may potentially be used to generate a given master
frame. The master frames which are generated by the Elixir system are
associated with the science images by the period of time for which the
master was created. For dark and bias images, only a single set of
masters are needed for a typcial CFH12K run, as these data are quite
stable with time. (Can we use the same dark \& bias masters
run-to-run??). Flat-field images are frequently stable enough that a
single master may be used for an entire run, but the option is
available to sub-divide the run in case the flat-field structure
changes. This may happen if dust is introduced by shutter or filter
changes.
The creation of the master detrend frames involves an iterative
process. A first-pass master is created by use all appropriate
images. This master is used to generate residual frames, which are
examined to identify signifcant outliers which should be excluded.
This process is done by hand, with the aid of both convenient,
scaled-down images and statistics on the individual images. The
images which remain after outliers are excluded are then combined to
create a second-pass master frame. This process is repeated until the
residuals are sufficiently small.
Once master detrend frames are produced, they are inserted in a
database which records the relevant information needed to identify a
specific science image with the various types of detrend data. At
this point, some of the flat-field images which have been created are
corrected for a known error which is thought to be caused by scattered
light. This correction is currently applied only to the BVRI
flat-field images since only these have sufficient calibration
information to ensure that the correction is an improvement. The
newly corrected flats are also added to the detrend database, which
maintain information needed both to distinguish the corrected and
uncorrected versions and to supply the appropriate version as needed.
Master fringe frame creation can only occur once the previous set of
master detrend frames are created. The fringe frames are created by
combining a set of input images which have been already corrected for
bias, dark, and flat. The details of the fringe creation can be found
elsewhere. The master fringe creation is generally similar to the
creation of other detrend frames. All of the science images which
have enough sky flux to be useful are selected and prepared by being
detrended. These images are then used to generate the master fringe
frame in an iterative process. One significant difference from the
other types of detrend frames is the method used to determine the
strength of the fringe pattern. The fringe pattern is an additive
term which sits on top of the base level sky emission. Since these
two terms are only weakly correlated, it is necessary to distinguish
the sky from the fringe strength. The analysis system measures the
fringe strength for each input CCD image, and it is necessary to
maintain the resulting fringe strength in the master frame so it is
clear how to apply it to any science image.
After the various detrend frames have been created, all images of the
sky are passed to the photometric and astrometric analysis
Processing performed for each distributed image:
- detrending & defringing
- creation of jpeg images for each detrended images
- insertion of keywords in headers
Data products distributed:
- detrended & defringed science images
- detrended standard stars (short images not defringed)
- all relevant master detrend images
- html manifest (dads)
Elixir databases used to relate images and reduced products
- detrend database
- image zero point database
- nightly zero point statistics database
Outstanding issues:
- low-frequency 'defringing'?
|