WIRCam Throughput
Throughput Model

By definition, the throughput is a fraction that expresses the flux of electrons detected on the detectors divided by the incoming flux of photons above the atmosphere intersecting the surface area of the telescope mirrors. Thus, the measured flux of electrons must be compared to a model of the transmission of our telescope + optics + filter + detector + atmosphere system.

Throughput = T_atm * QE * T_Optics * T_mirror * T_filter

Here is a table of our best guess values for each of these transmissions for each filter:

Best guess model values for the wide-band filters
FilterCentral &lambdaBandpassT_filter †Detector Q.E. †† T_optics ‡ T_mirror ‡‡
J 1.253 0.158 0.86 0.75 0.70 0.92
H 1.631 0.289 0.975 0.75 0.75 0.94
Ks 2.146 0.325 0.98 0.80 0.69 0.96
Y 1.035 0.100 0.74 0.5?? 0.80 0.91
Filters were scanned so values are accurate (see filter curves). We assume a constant filter transmission within the cut-off wavelengths.
†† Quoted by Rockwell - has notoriously large uncertainties of at least 15%. Not to be taken at face values. Only measured in K and J.
Optics transmission is what was modeled by the designers, INO (Institut national d'optique) including AR coatings based on samples measurements. The optics transmission curves (exluding the telescope mirror and tip-tilt plate) are given here in an Excel file (use the Total column).
‡‡ This is the transmission per surface. WIRCam is at prime focus so counted only once for the primary mirror. Based on measurements closest to the standard star observations of the reflectivity of the mirror at 670 nm and on a curve of the change of reflectivity as a function of wavelength made by D. Salmon.

We use 8.4 m2 as the collecting area of the telescope (this deals with central obscuration). We assumed no atmospheric absorption at all (T_atm=1). To compute the flux of photons, we used two magnitude systems:

  • The Vega system of magnitudes where, by definition, Vega has mag=0. We used the models by Kurucz (Teff=9400K, log(g)=3.9, Fe/H=0.00) and the renormalization of the flux (3.44±0.05x10e-9 erg/cm2/s/Ang) by Cohen (1992, AJ 104).
  • The AB system of magnitudes where, by definition, a constant flux of 3720 Jansky represents mag=0.
Throughput measurements

Caution! it was found by three different teams that the Vega to AB conversions were off by up to 0.2 mag in Ks. The numbers given here will need to be revised. See their numbers on the WIRCam DIET page

The following table gives the expected zero-points (the magnitude at which the flux is 1 photon/sec) in the Vega and AB systems, computed from these models. Also given are the actual measurements on the sky using standard stars. For these measurements, the electronic gain used is 2.5e-/adu and we also assumed that there is a one-to-one photon/electron conversion. Note that the gain has been corrected for the capacitive coupling measured on our arrays which smooths the noise and causes the traditional transfer curves to overestimates the gain (the correction here was ~13%). The throughput is given for filters J,H,Ks for which standard star magnitudes are published.

Expected and Measured Throughput and Zero Points
FilterExpected Vega Z.P.Expected AB Z.P.Measured Vega Z.P.†Expected ThroughputMeasured Throughput
Y 24.56 25.22 no std star 27% ?
J 25.03 25.98 25.02±0.02 42% 41%
H 25.19 26.58 25.19±0.02 52% 52%
Ks 24.43 26.42 24.45±0.03 52% 53%
LowOH1 21.71 22.40 no std star 21% ?
LowOH2 21.61 22.48 no std star 25% ?
CH4On 23.85 25.31 no std star 48% ?
CH4Off 23.96 25.30 no std star 44% ?
H2 21.78 23.75 no std star 45% ?
Kcont 21.62 23.71 no std star 45% ?
BrGamma 21.58 23.61 no std star 43% ?
This is the mean ZP for the 4 arrays. There is an array to array systematic difference, see next table.
Relative Quantum Efficiencies of the 4 arrays through the wide-band filters
FilterMean Vega Z.P.Array #77 (N.-W.) — Mean Z.P.Array #52 (S.-W.) — Mean Z.P.Array #54 (S.-E.) — Mean Z.P.Array #60 (N.-E.) — Mean Z.P.
Y ? +0.07 -0.09 +0.00 +0.01
J 25.02 +0.05 -0.09 +0.00 +0.02
H 25.19 +0.03 -0.05 -0.01 +0.02
Ks 24.45 +0.02 -0.03 -0.02 +0.03